or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › Comparison of Edward Green Lasts
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Comparison of Edward Green Lasts

post #1 of 10
Thread Starter 
Here's a great link provided by Timeless Rider in his post about his new EG Shannon boots on Last 82. It's a great resource, as it shows a comparison of the major lasts used for lace-up shoes by Edward Green -- 82, 505, 606 and 888. It also has a comparo with a JLobb last 7000. Most striking I think is the difference betwee EG last 606 and 888. I had always lumped these two together as being virtually identical - -but they clearly are not; 606 has a more squared-off toe and 888 is more of a curved "banana" shape. The 202 looks positively dowdy in the photos too -- funny, as the two EGs I have on 202 are much sharper looking I think. http://img25.imageshack.us/gal.php?g=eg606-eg888_sm.jpg
post #2 of 10
Quote:
Here's a great link provided by Timeless Rider in his post about his new EG Shannon boots on Last 82.  It's a great resource, as it shows a comparison of the major lasts used for lace-up shoes by Edward Green -- 82, 505, 606 and 888.  It also has a comparo with a JLobb last 7000.  Most striking I think is the difference betwee EG last 606 and 888.  I had always lumped these two together as being virtually identical - -but they clearly are not; 606 has a more squared-off toe and 888 is more of a curved "banana" shape.  The 202 looks positively dowdy in the photos too -- funny, as the two EGs I have on 202 are much sharper looking I think. http://img25.imageshack.us/gal.php?g=eg606-eg888_sm.jpg
Agree about the 202. Looks much better in person than it does in pictures (in pics, seems to look too "pointy", to my eyes anyway...). Recently purchased the Helmsley on the 202, and they really make my big ol' feet look good.
post #3 of 10
Good post. Do you know how long ImageShack will continue to host? (i.e. maybe I should download the pics).
post #4 of 10
Thread Starter 
I don't know. I've already copied the photos to my harddrive because of that concern.
post #5 of 10
Quote:
The 202 looks positively dowdy in the photos too -- funny, as the two EGs I have on 202 are much sharper looking I think.
That's because I have wide feet. All the Greens in the pictures have an 'F' fitting.
post #6 of 10
Your Chelsea's are a 12 1/2 D if I'm not mistaken Kabert (I almost bid on them,) - the 202 looks rather elegant in that size. In shorter and wider sizes it is a fairly standard looking last. I'd like to see the new 82 in a size 12 or 12 1/2, I'll bet it is stunning.
post #7 of 10
Thread Starter 
You're probably right. Good memory too, by the way. The Chelsea's are marked "12-1/2 / 13 D" which I think means they are US 13C. I bought them from EBay seller English-Shoes. So, I guess they are long and somewhat narrow.
post #8 of 10
Anyone know how the 808 compares to the 888?
post #9 of 10
Hmmm, off the top of my head the 808 has a slimmer toe (tapers more sharply) while the 888 is slightly angled at the tip. I like the look of the 808 better, but it does not fit as well as the 888.
post #10 of 10
is there an updated EG catalog with Last descriptions? the EG catalogs we have in the Shoe pictorial thread don't show all the lasts. Does someone have an updated EG catalog or something like that?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Classic Menswear
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › Comparison of Edward Green Lasts