Quote:
If you read the rules and followed them, then you wouldn't break them. As you had obviously planned, you were going to continue to "discount" a whopping 2% per bump of your thread. Oh boy, quite a discount scheme. This is exactly what is NOT needed on the board. I'd suggest you take the 10% off (minimum) route instead of bumping 5 times at 2%.
You are abusing a good thing.
You are abusing a good thing.
Like I said, I am not contesting having my thread closed due to not following the rules...
I had a problem with the personal remarks left in the thread by the "vigilante" trying to speak for people about things he knew nothing of.
It was my mistake and I owned up to it. I think the word "Abuse" is a bit harsh seeing as how this is the first and only time this happened.
I suggest getting your own facts straight before you critique others.
(Its 5% minimum not 10% and if you would read the rules you would know that)
Quote:
I'm more amused a new member with a whopping three posts was kind enough to bump the thread for him for no other apparent reason than to bump the thread for him.
I found that amusing as well but if your implying I had anything to do with that, you would be mistaken. However, if you check his last 3 posts they are all random bumps for random items.
Im surprised more focus isnt being put on people like this, as it seems like more of an "Abuse" then an under discount issue.
I guess it all depends on where your prioritys lie.







reported for derogatory use of word "retard". they are people too.