Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Streetwear and Denim › (Old) The WAYWT Discussion Thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

(Old) The WAYWT Discussion Thread - Page 1011  

post #15151 of 21557
11/5/09 at 12:01am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kent Money View Post
I feel ya Bach, at times I feel that the Flatheads are a little tight for my build, I wish I coulda got them in a 34 instead of 33.

Does anyone else think they are in the 'too tight' category?

I'd be happier with my skulls if they were 30 instead of 29. Was going to quit wearing them after the top button broke (which is its own story) but decided just to keep rockin them.

Featured Stories on Styleforum

Styleforum Watch Appreciation Thread: show, tell, debate.
Random fashion thoughts - aka community ramblings
Allen Edmonds Appreciation Thread
post #15152 of 21557
11/5/09 at 12:10am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kent Money View Post
Teger - Ya know, I did that not too long ago and it worked ok. The thing is, doesnt really help stretch the calf out...

However, I think the jeans may look a little tighter in the pictures because it was my first time wearing them in a while, they shrink a little...

dmash, our jeans are two different models. The SExFH05s are really slim to begin with...

My bad, I thought you were referring to Flatheads in general
post #15153 of 21557
11/5/09 at 12:57am
Grr - lighting turned out a bit inconsistent this time. Oh well. The close-ups show true colour better. Epaulet Momotaro Alden
post #15154 of 21557
11/5/09 at 1:19am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kent Money View Post
I feel ya Bach, at times I feel that the Flatheads are a little tight for my build, I wish I coulda got them in a 34 instead of 33.

Does anyone else think they are in the 'too tight' category?

I think the cuffed jeans you are wearing are perfect for your build. The SExFH can certainly work but I would try them with a slimmer overall silhouette.
post #15155 of 21557
11/5/09 at 1:28am
Like everything about that fit except the proportions, Doctor. You need to sag your jeans way the fuck down or something, looks like you're on stilts.
post #15156 of 21557
11/5/09 at 1:42am
Quote:
Originally Posted by slaani View Post
Like everything about that fit except the proportions, Doctor. You need to sag your jeans way the fuck down or something, looks like you're on stilts.

They practically are, he's like 2 meters from what I remember. Definitely don't envy him in trying to find clothes/shoes that fit.
post #15157 of 21557
11/5/09 at 1:51am
Quote:
Originally Posted by slaani View Post
Like everything about that fit except the proportions, Doctor. You need to sag your jeans way the fuck down or something, looks like you're on stilts.

Like Aeglus said... 39" inseam - no hemming, shoes are 15E... I'm over 2m tall with long legs to boot.

Honestly, I usually wear my shirt untucked for this reason. It evens me out a bit. I had hoped it wasn't *so* obvious. Ah well.... Back to no tuck...
post #15158 of 21557
11/5/09 at 2:07am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kent Money View Post
Teger - Ya know, I did that not too long ago and it worked ok. The thing is, doesnt really help stretch the calf out...

However, I think the jeans may look a little tighter in the pictures because it was my first time wearing them in a while, they shrink a little...

dmash, our jeans are two different models. The SExFH05s are really slim to begin with...


I think they look too tight.
post #15159 of 21557
11/5/09 at 2:09am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doctor View Post
tall with long legs to boot... [h]onestly, I usually wear my shirt untucked for this reason. It evens me out a bit.

I feel your pain, brah.
post #15160 of 21557
11/5/09 at 2:13am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kent Money View Post
Past few days
Is that a Uniqlo sweatshirt?
post #15161 of 21557
11/5/09 at 2:16am
39" inseam.... holy shit! haha. I do think you should loosen up a bit, sag your jeans a little, let the shirt be casual and untuck it.
post #15162 of 21557
11/5/09 at 2:49am
Momos look like they're starting to break. Isn't the electric blue nice? also the top block on 0701's doesn't like to sag IMO
post #15163 of 21557
11/5/09 at 2:50am
Quote:
Originally Posted by impolyt_one View Post
39" inseam.... holy shit! haha.

I do think you should loosen up a bit, sag your jeans a little, let the shirt be casual and untuck it.

That is a crazy inseam, damn.
post #15164 of 21557
11/5/09 at 3:18am
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doctor View Post
Like Aeglus said... 39" inseam - no hemming, shoes are 15E... I'm over 2m tall with long legs to boot. Honestly, I usually wear my shirt untucked for this reason. It evens me out a bit. I had hoped it wasn't *so* obvious. Ah well.... Back to no tuck...
Being 6'3" I have dealt with a more minor version of this issue. If you sagged your jeans (every inch down is +2 inches to your torso relative to your legs) you could make your legs look less stiltsy. You can also play angles like lower rises and thinner belts to eke out a few more perceived inches on your torso without Soulja Boy sagging. you pretty much sold me on a pair of aldens for my next shoe, nice kicks.
post #15165 of 21557
11/5/09 at 3:33am
I'm 6'3", so your strategy is to get a high rise jean like 11.5/12 and then just wear them mid? The problem with being tall and wearing low rise denim is that your tops won't really fit.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Streetwear and Denim
This thread is locked  

Featured Stories on Styleforum

Styleforum Watch Appreciation Thread: show, tell, debate.
Random fashion thoughts - aka community ramblings
Allen Edmonds Appreciation Thread
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Streetwear and Denim › (Old) The WAYWT Discussion Thread