or Connect
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › First Chan suit received
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

First Chan suit received - Page 4

post #46 of 161
I recall seeing pictures of a Chan suit that Kai had made that was an entirely different cut/style that yours. Kai's was basically a classic cut -- some would say boring or traditional. Nothing "contemporary" about it. I think the suit you received has a bit of a contemporary style to it, both from the looks and your description. Nothing wrong with that if that's what you are looking for. Also, it looks as though you stand with one shoulder lower than the other, which may account for the sleeve issue, at least in part.
post #47 of 161
Quote:
Also, it looks as though you stand with one shoulder lower than the other, which may account for the sleeve issue, at least in part.
I noticed that myself. Still, any tailor worth his salt should be able to navigate the idiosyncrasies of our bodies.
post #48 of 161
Quote:
1)Do you believe that one facet of a society can have negative characteristics while another does not, particularly if that facet is an occupation?
Well, sure.  I think that we see that all the time.  For example, people say that the Russians make great vodka, but not great cars.  I don't think a less-than-positive review of Russian automobiles reveals contempt for all things Russian.
Quote:
2)The posters perception is that Asians (Mongloids) are producing a sub-standard and inferior product to Europeans (Caucasoids), both of which are RACES, hence the comment is RACIST.
That's one interpretation, but given the racial diversity of modern Europe, I would assume that the writer was drawing a distinction between nationalities.  I'm sure that the Row and the various factories in Italy both employ non-British or non-Italians, and even non-Europeans.  Thus, the tailoring cultures in these different places are just that:  cultures.  Not racial characteristics.  
Quote:
3)I believe it's Xenophobic because there is an underlying culture of hatred towards Asians on this board and another fashion board for this reason I believe: a)The bespoke industry is dying in Europe b)The bespoke industry is growing in Asia a1)If it becomes possible (or is possible) to obtain a bespoke garment from Asia for 1/2 or less the price than a European bespoke garment; the elitism which accompanies Saville Row clothing will be lessened in the eyes of those that have paid $3000+ for their suits. You saw this kind of attitude in American in the 70s when Japanese car manufacturers began to sell Hondas and Toyotas here. Thankfully you dont see anyone referring to Asian tailors as Slants or worse; at least we don't see it - I'm sure it's happening verbally.
I too am glad that there's no name-calling.  However (and I'm too young to know this first hand), wasn't it the case that Japanese cars really took off in the United States because they were affordable and good quality?  The point the original writer was trying to make, I think, was that this Chan suit reveals the opposite state of affairs:  an inferior product.   Moreover, I think a little national pride is healthy.  If an Italian or a Brit (and I am neither) said that his country's tailoring is the best, and better than anything found anywhere else, I wouldn't read that as "racist" or "xenophobic," but rather as an assertion of pride.  Pride is good, so long as it doesn't turn ugly.
post #49 of 161
Quote:
Quote:
1)Do you believe that one facet of a society can have negative characteristics while another does not, particularly if that facet is an occupation?
Well, sure.  I think that we see that all the time.  For example, people say that the Russians make great vodka, but not great cars.  I don't think a less-than-positive review of Russian automobiles reveals contempt for all things Russian.
Quote:
2)The posters perception is that Asians (Mongloids) are producing a sub-standard and inferior product to Europeans (Caucasoids), both of which are RACES, hence the comment is RACIST.
That's one interpretation, but given the racial diversity of modern Europe, I would assume that the writer was drawing a distinction between nationalities.  I'm sure that the Row and the various factories in Italy both employ non-British or non-Italians, and even non-Europeans.  Thus, the tailoring cultures in these different places are just that:  cultures.  Not racial characteristics.  
Quote:
3)I believe it's Xenophobic because there is an underlying culture of hatred towards Asians on this board and another fashion board for this reason I believe: a)The bespoke industry is dying in Europe b)The bespoke industry is growing in Asia a1)If it becomes possible (or is possible) to obtain a bespoke garment from Asia for 1/2 or less the price than a European bespoke garment; the elitism which accompanies Saville Row clothing will be lessened in the eyes of those that have paid $3000+ for their suits. You saw this kind of attitude in American in the 70s when Japanese car manufacturers began to sell Hondas and Toyotas here. Thankfully you dont see anyone referring to Asian tailors as Slants or worse; at least we don't see it - I'm sure it's happening verbally.
I too am glad that there's no name-calling.  However (and I'm too young to know this first hand), wasn't it the case that Japanese cars really took off in the United States because they were affordable and good quality?  The point the original writer was trying to make, I think, was that this Chan suit reveals the opposite state of affairs:  an inferior product.   Moreover, I think a little national pride is healthy.  If an Italian or a Brit (and I am neither) said that his country's tailoring is the best, and better than anything found anywhere else, I wouldn't read that as "racist" or "xenophobic," but rather as an assertion of pride.  Pride is good, so long as it doesn't turn ugly.
I have a problem with racial pride, not national pride. The tailor pejoratively labeled Asians as inferior tailors, and Brits and Italians as superior tailors - across the board. There are undoubtedly horrible British and Italian tailors and fantastic Asian (Indian, Thai, Chinese, Japanese, etc.) tailors. and Vice Versa. The pejorative that Asians are inferior craftsman is despicable though, and flat out racist. And that's what was said, PERIOD.
post #50 of 161
Quote:
Let me try to save Naturlat (who I believe is Asian himself): The workload at the Asian tailoring firms like Chan is much heavier than the workload at Savile Row and Italian firms, etc.  Unlike a Savile Row suit, where the turnaround time can be up to a year, the Chan's of the Asian world try to turn their product around in a matter of weeks (I got my second Chan suit 16 days after I ordered it).  Combine quick turnaround times with heavy workloads, and workers have less time to dedicate to each particular garment.
I am aware that Naturlaut is Asian, but that does not change anything. Just because they have a higher workload does not mean that they are:
Quote:
not as dedicated in their work than one would find on the Row or in Italy.
post #51 of 161
Quote:
Quote:
(Taliesin @ April 25 2005,12:40) Quote 1)Do you believe that one facet of a society can have negative characteristics while another does not, particularly if that facet is an occupation?
Well, sure.  I think that we see that all the time.  For example, people say that the Russians make great vodka, but not great cars.  I don't think a less-than-positive review of Russian automobiles reveals contempt for all things Russian.
Quote:
2)The posters perception is that Asians (Mongloids) are producing a sub-standard and inferior product to Europeans (Caucasoids), both of which are RACES, hence the comment is RACIST.
That's one interpretation, but given the racial diversity of modern Europe, I would assume that the writer was drawing a distinction between nationalities.  I'm sure that the Row and the various factories in Italy both employ non-British or non-Italians, and even non-Europeans.  Thus, the tailoring cultures in these different places are just that:  cultures.  Not racial characteristics.  
Quote:
3)I believe it's Xenophobic because there is an underlying culture of hatred towards Asians on this board and another fashion board for this reason I believe: a)The bespoke industry is dying in Europe b)The bespoke industry is growing in Asia a1)If it becomes possible (or is possible) to obtain a bespoke garment from Asia for 1/2 or less the price than a European bespoke garment; the elitism which accompanies Saville Row clothing will be lessened in the eyes of those that have paid $3000+ for their suits. You saw this kind of attitude in American in the 70s when Japanese car manufacturers began to sell Hondas and Toyotas here. Thankfully you dont see anyone referring to Asian tailors as Slants or worse; at least we don't see it - I'm sure it's happening verbally.
I too am glad that there's no name-calling.  However (and I'm too young to know this first hand), wasn't it the case that Japanese cars really took off in the United States because they were affordable and good quality?  The point the original writer was trying to make, I think, was that this Chan suit reveals the opposite state of affairs:  an inferior product.   Moreover, I think a little national pride is healthy.  If an Italian or a Brit (and I am neither) said that his country's tailoring is the best, and better than anything found anywhere else, I wouldn't read that as "racist" or "xenophobic," but rather as an assertion of pride.  Pride is good, so long as it doesn't turn ugly.
I have a problem with racial pride, not national pride. The tailor pejoratively labeled Asians as inferior tailors, and Brits and Italians as superior tailors - across the board. There are undoubtedly horrible British and Italian tailors and fantastic Asian (Indian, Thai, Chinese, Japanese, etc.) tailors. and Vice Versa. The pejorative that Asians are inferior craftsman is despicable though, and flat out racist. And that's what was said, PERIOD.[/quote] Dude, you need to chill out. The post was clearly referring to Asian TAILORS, not Asian "craftsmen" in general. I don't think someone posting about automobiles or high-end electronics would have the same opinion about the merits of Asian work product as compared to that of the UK or Italy. Second, as someone else pointed out, Naturlaut is himself Asian, so your ranting about racism is entirely misplaced. Finally, the post itself was largely accurate and based on facts, not prejudices. Asian tailors are primarily associated with low-cost, high-volume operations that sell through tours of American and European cities as well as to tourists visiting their countries. The typical Asian custom suit is produced based on one set of measurements that takes 5 or 10 minutes. Savile Row and Italian custom tailors, on the other hand, have a long tradition of quality workmanship and although they also do tours of American cities, they also have clients from around the world who visit them to have suits made. Moreover, most of them require multiple measurement and fitting sessions of an hour or more. I'm certainly not aware of any Asian tailors who have the same heritage and reputation as A&S, Huntsman, Battistoni, etc., etc., and you certainly don't see any Savile Row or Italian tailors charging $400 for a "custom" suit. You of all people should know the differences because of that awful piece of crap Ravis suit you posted on Ask Andy. While that may be primarily your fault for providing poor measurements and not specifying precisely what you wanted, it's difficult to imagine any Savile Row or Italian firm providing you with a similar garment.
post #52 of 161
Policy, Since you are the academic and love definitions I would suggest you look up 'revisionist history'. I was happy to let that thread on Andy's drop but for those who missed it, I believe that it was you, sir, who displayed an unforgivable cruelty and lack of sensitivity when you made your little remark about the Special Olympics. So let's review: You accused those who responded to your thread of bigotry because they suggested that you could not expect Savile Row bespoke quality when spending $399 for a made to measure suit in Thailand. You took great offense to the suggestion that perhaps your own measurements were fallible.  This after you announced that the back of your jacket lacked a canvas interlining and displayed a complete lack of understanding of even the basics of fabrics when you failed to differentiate between micronage and weight.  You then proudly announced the 17 changes you demanded be made to your 'fully bespoke suit', displaying once again a complete lack of understanding regarding the term bespoke. Some people were tough on you, others helpful.  I had no interest in pointing out that your ignorance was only exceeded by the volume and arrogance with which you proclaimed your false assumptions. Some of the 'effeminate' posters you accused of being racist against those with darker than pale English skin were in fact several shades beyond George Hamilton on the pigmentation chart and, in fact, Asian in ancestry. So let's be clear:  You opine loudly about a subject in which the sum total of your knowledge creates a void that makes a black hole seem crowded by comparison.  Then when it is pointed out to you, politely by some, not so politely by others you engage in the sophomoric sideshow trick of screaming racism and questioning the relative masculinity of those to whom you are shrieking.  That's an ad hominem attack.  It's a debate trick to use when you are utterly devoid of a substantive response.  It goes like this: Substantive Question:  Sir, I present these 12 facts that counter the opinion you just expressed. Ad hominem response:  Yeah, but you are a racist fag and a retard One has to listen closely to discern the slight difference in weight between those two methods of persuasion but the difference is important. I was willing to walk away from that whole argument in disgust without giving you a public over the head wedgie but you made a crucial mistake:  You went and displayed a bigotry of your own with a comment that was so far beyond the limits of common decency as to make the Klan look compassionate.  You proclaimed that winning an argument with the folks on the board was like winning in the special olympics - even if you were to win you would still be retarded. Having spent several years working with disabled children, having coached and mentored with the Special Olympics and having at least an ounce of decency within me I concluded that you are not just an arrogant bigot - you are also unimaginably cruel and vicious. So you can opine at will regarding your fully bespoke Super 100 weight, rear-canvassed suit about which you know very little but for you to self righteously point around the room while screaming xenophobia and racism is laughable.   Perhaps you should have remained silent and allowed others to think you a fool rather than opening your yap and removing all remaining doubt. My apologies to the rest of the forum for this off topic rant.  I make it a practice to bite my lip and avoid the pissing contest threads but well, Policy's cute little comment about children with mental disabilities put me over the edge.   I will behave now J, no need to click the 'ban' button EDITED TO NOTE: I'm not opining on the comments about Asian tailoring on THIS thread, just Policy's assertion that the beating he took on another thread was due to racism and not due to his own ignorance and arrogance.
post #53 of 161
Quote:
Second, as someone else pointed out, Naturlaut is himself Asian, so your ranting about racism is entirely misplaced.   Finally, the post itself was largely accurate and based on facts, not prejudices.  Asian tailors are primarily associated with low-cost, high-volume operations that sell through tours of American and European cities as well as to tourists visiting their countries.  
I beg to differ. Being Asian does not give one the moral license to be racist to any race, including one's own. The point here is that Asian tailors were described as not as dedicated in their art as their Savile Row and Italian counterparts. This is not the same thing as saying that they produce an inferior garment due to a myraid of other reasons (high workload, inferior technology). But I will let this argument go. While I read many posts here that stereotype homosexuals and Asians, I don't see many that stereotype heterosexuals and Caucasians. It's not that hard to refrain from being -- or posting messages that seem -- racist or sexist or homophobic. Why must we still engage in this practice?
post #54 of 161
Good grief. I really cant believe where this thread has gone since I read it this morning.
post #55 of 161
St. Carlo: Game / Set / Match.
post #56 of 161
Quote:
Dude, you need to chill out.  The post was clearly referring to Asian TAILORS, not Asian "craftsmen" in general.  I don't think someone posting about automobiles or high-end electronics would have the same opinion about the merits of Asian work product as compared to that of the UK or Italy. Second, as someone else pointed out, Naturlaut is himself Asian, so your ranting about racism is entirely misplaced.   Finally, the post itself was largely accurate and based on facts, not prejudices.  Asian tailors are primarily associated with low-cost, high-volume operations that sell through tours of American and European cities as well as to tourists visiting their countries.   The typical Asian custom suit is produced based on one set of measurements that takes 5 or 10 minutes.  Savile Row and Italian custom tailors, on the other hand, have a long tradition of quality workmanship and although they also do tours of American cities, they also have clients from around the world who visit them to have suits made.  Moreover, most of them require multiple measurement and fitting sessions of an hour or more. I'm certainly not aware of any Asian tailors who have the same heritage and reputation as A&S, Huntsman, Battistoni, etc., etc., and you certainly don't see any Savile Row or Italian tailors charging $400 for a "custom" suit. You of all people should know the differences because of that awful piece of crap Ravis suit you posted on Ask Andy.  While that may be primarily your fault for providing poor measurements and not specifying precisely what you wanted, it's difficult to imagine any Savile Row or Italian firm providing you with a similar garment.
The reason that you won't see people knocking Asian craftsmen is because unlike tailoring, manufacturing is a science, tailoring is completely subjective, there are absolutely no rules in fashion which are scientific, they are all esoteric. "Second, as someone else pointed out, Naturlaut is himself Asian, so your ranting about racism is entirely misplaced." Someone that's Asian can be racist against Asians, just like Blacks can be racist against Blacks, and Whites can be racist against Whites. Just because you are a race doesn't mean you can't make racist statements about another race. If a Black people says that Blacks are lazy, is he making a racist statement? YES. Just because someone is the same race as the race they are DENIGRATING doesn't make them immune from prosecution. "Finally, the post itself was largely accurate and based on facts, not prejudices" Let's see which weak assed motherfucking FACTS you provide us with: "Asian tailors are primarily associated with low-cost, high-volume operations that sell through tours of American and European cities as well as to tourists visiting their countries." OPINION. "The typical Asian custom suit is produced based on one set of measurements that takes 5 or 10 minutes." OPINION. " Savile Row and Italian custom tailors, on the other hand, have a long tradition of quality workmanship and although they also do tours of American cities, they also have clients from around the world who visit them to have suits made." OPINION. "Moreover, most of them require multiple measurement and fitting sessions of an hour or more. I'm certainly not aware of any Asian tailors who have the same heritage and reputation as A&S, Huntsman, Battistoni, etc., etc., and you certainly don't see any Savile Row or Italian tailors charging $400 for a "custom" suit." First OPINION, second FALSEHOOD. You can get custom suits in Italy for well under $400 US dollars. Why don't you try taking a trip there? "You of all people should know the differences because of that awful piece of crap Ravis suit you posted on Ask Andy. While that may be primarily your fault for providing poor measurements and not specifying precisely what you wanted, it's difficult to imagine any Savile Row or Italian firm providing you with a similar garment." OPINION. Wow, your facts were really decimating to my argument. I'm not sure what kind of source citations they require at Burger King or wherever else you're employed, but at a job which requires real facts and sources, you sir would have been SERVED.
post #57 of 161
Anyone who mocks children with disabilities and the need for them to participate in a group setting such as the Special Olympics should not participate in this forum. Period. To abuse Naturlaut, who has as good taste as anyone on this forum, is also unforgiveable. I don't know who you are, Policy, but I'd like to hear the last from you.
post #58 of 161
Quote:
Let's see which weak assed motherf***ing FACTS you provide us with:
Fixed your post.   Dope.
post #59 of 161
Policy, you are a lunatic and an idiot. Now that is OPINION -- albeit one supported by FACTS.
post #60 of 161
I would have to take issue with Bryce 330's statement to the effect that the typical Asian custom suit is based one set of measurements that takes 5 to 10 minutes. When I was measured for my first Chan suit last fall, Patrick Chu spent a good deal of time (probably at least a half-hour) measuring me and the suit I was wearing and photographing me from several angles. I can recall at least one post on this forum from a gentleman who found Hemrajani to be a good deal more meticulous and thorough than Patrick. Are the products of Chan and Hemrajani "typical Asian custom suits"? Maybe, maybe not. I will add that I thought it would be unrealistic to expect perfection in a first order of this sort. Did I get perfection from Chan? No. I thought the sleeves were trifle longer than optimum and it could have had a bit more waist suppression. Did I get a handsome garment and value for money? Most definitely. This has been confirmed by the fact that I have been complimented on it a number of times by total strangers. I discussed the corrections I wanted with Patrick when I ordered my next garment from him last month, and he seemed very amenable to them. I'll be eager to see how my next garment turns out. Chan does make mistakes, but, then, I seem to recall a thread on the Andy Forum from a fellow who had all manner of problems with A&S of Savile Row, no less. One fellow did post a photo of a suit from Chan on which the sleeves were definitely too long. I believe (if it was the same guy) that they were going to correct this and give him a free shirt for his troubles on this matter, so evidently they do stand behind their products.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Classic Menswear
Styleforum › Forums › Men's Style › Classic Menswear › First Chan suit received