Styleforum › Forums › General › General Chat › Business meeting pick-ups
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Business meeting pick-ups - Page 4

post #46 of 194
2/6/09 at 3:19pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by why View Post
It's the social version of NIMBY, if you will.

When it comes to teh cack, I readily admit I have a very strict NIMBY policy.
Reply
Reply

Featured Stories on Styleforum

Marketplace: Classic menswear, shoes, and accessories
Derek Rose at Pitti Uomo 83
Antonio Liverano, Florentine tailor
post #47 of 194
2/6/09 at 3:19pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dakota rube View Post
Wait.
Richard Simmons has teh ghey?

Color me surprised. I just thought he was High on Life! or overcaffeinated.
Reply
Reply
post #48 of 194
2/6/09 at 3:34pm
This has to be one of the best threads on tihs forum.
Reply
Reply
post #49 of 194
2/6/09 at 3:51pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Douglas View Post
When it comes to teh cack, I readily admit I have a very strict NIMBY policy.

ORLY??

http://www.styleforum.net/showpost.p...37&postcount=1
Reply
Reply
post #50 of 194
2/6/09 at 3:57pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by edmorel View Post
A lot of physcological mumbo jumbo going on here. No need to overanalyze this. Why, you like kack. Nothing wrong with that. Just don't kid yourself, dating women will lead to disappointment for you and them. You want to bang this guy, bang him. You are gay. Eason is gay. Accept it, enjoy your men and move on with your lives. That is why I have a lot of respect for guys like rach/gosurface/randallr, they know who they are and they lead their lives for them, not for others. If a man makes your peepee feel funny, follow it's lead. I think you posted a pic once and you and randallr would make a cute couple.


+1. I also think Labelking needs to drop the "nuetral" observer charade and give it a go go with a dwarf.
Reply
Reply
post #51 of 194
2/6/09 at 4:04pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by mafoofan Jr. View Post
holy $hit! You too?

You couldn't tell from his pictures?
Reply
Reply
post #52 of 194
2/6/09 at 4:40pm
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by edmorel View Post
A lot of physcological mumbo jumbo going on here. No need to overanalyze this. Why, you like kack. Nothing wrong with that. Just don't kid yourself, dating women will lead to disappointment for you and them.

To be honest I've had sex with more women than men.
Reply
Reply
post #53 of 194
2/6/09 at 4:43pm
no such thing as bi in my opinion. just an uncommitted ghey (nothing wrong with ghey).
Reply
Reply
post #54 of 194
2/6/09 at 4:45pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by thekunk07 View Post
no such thing as bi in my opinion. just an uncommitted ghey (nothing wrong with ghey).
I agree only insofar as I find it impossible to believe that anybody who has gone ghey could EVER then thereafter want to go and cavort with a MoD. Just SEE who gives you a better blowjob. As Elaine from Seinfeld once said (when trying to get one to change teams), When you don't have access to the "equipment," you just don't know what to do with it as well as those who have access to it all the time.
Reply
Reply
post #55 of 194
2/6/09 at 4:58pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by rach2jlc View Post
I agree only insofar as I find it impossible to believe that anybody who has gone ghey could EVER then thereafter want to go and cavort with a MoD.
Welcome the MoD, in all its endearments. Also, see the Christina Hendricks thread.
Reply
Reply
post #56 of 194
2/6/09 at 5:02pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by RJman View Post
Welcome the MoD, in all its endearments. Also, see the Christina Hendricks thread.

Will it produce such confusion as did the Hathawafication some months back?
Reply
Reply
post #57 of 194
2/6/09 at 5:05pm
i'd rather suck a dick than look at anne hathaway. she'd downey looking and boring and those cans will go to pot-then she'll have nothing but the residue of that italian's cheesy wang.
Reply
Reply
post #58 of 194
2/6/09 at 5:05pm
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by thekunk07 View Post
no such thing as bi in my opinion. just an uncommitted ghey (nothing wrong with ghey).

Or vice versa.

And rach is right again.
Reply
Reply
post #59 of 194
2/6/09 at 5:06pm
^yeah agreed. i think i've said this but my friend sucked a few dicks and said he was experimenting. i disagree. experimenting is dying your hair or taking up martial arts, not m-on-m fellatio.
Reply
Reply
post #60 of 194
2/6/09 at 5:07pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Étienne View Post
Straight relationships are so varied that if you try and shun everything that is a mirror image of straight relationships, you don't have many possibilities left.

There is a definite mould of heteronormalcy that I often find quite hard to deal with even as a straight man so I know where why and rach are coming from. Heavily scripted scenarios for interactions and normative weight can put a strain on my tolerance of "the other" as surely as say, an unkempt mollusc.

On the other hand women can have such an endearing way of fetichizing consumption that is about sheer sensual enjoyment and not a conduit for their feeling of (im)potency that I love 'em material bitches.
Reply
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: General Chat

Featured Stories on Styleforum

Marketplace: Classic menswear, shoes, and accessories
Derek Rose at Pitti Uomo 83
Antonio Liverano, Florentine tailor
Styleforum › Forums › General › General Chat › Business meeting pick-ups