Originally Posted by Nugget
I note I am being quoted, and get the odd feeling I am being taught something.... what is it?
As long as people still hold onto the perception of Seiko as a low-rent watch brand(in no small part, due to the company's meager offerings stateside) AND not see with their own eyes the terrific values within all levels (and there's a wide range of them) of Seiko products, yes, Seiko is still underrated.
Seiko might not be underrated on SF, thanks to the significant overlapping between SF membership and TZ/WUS. Even then, it has taken quite sometime for their reputation to spread on word of mouth.