or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by Groves

I thought they would be fine with the upper, and they were, but the calf area is still tight. Might be tighter than you think. Either way, post and let us know.
I don't know about that, ordered a pair of PNS and even for my tiny ass calves, they were skin tight. Got hammered on return shipping, too.See the PNS, if they're too tight, I figure your only options are to get your current pair hemmed to something you're happy with.
Wanting to pull the trigger on one or two items from Mr. Porter. Should a spring discount/coupon code be expected soon, or should I just pull the trigger?
This is the exact same problem for me too, well, not exact, I'd be in a 29, so I can always size up to the 30 and get the 33.5" inseam..hopefully. But it's a fucking shame, these would have been perfect.
Porter seems to have completely different measurments for the inseam, fucking 32". You stubby legged people...
Got so excited about these, then checked out measurements..inseam on the 29s are so short, and the 30 waist would be a proper fit + stretch..too much. ajhdlkajsdasd. No winning with APC.
Isn't that exactly what you want?
Their measurements are all wacked out.Leg opening increases with size and then goes back down? Unless this is due to an increase in seam length from tagged 28 to 29.
What? That was seriously directed at me? Would I really expect THAT much of a stretch?How long have you been wearing them for, and how has the stretch been?
All right, you dream killers. I started measuring and really taking a look at my jeans/body. Guess I was wrong and my waist is now measuring out at a 31, so a size up of 1 to the 513. Measured the 513s tagged at a 32 x 34: Waist: 33 (sags and I am wearing a belt) Rise: 10.5 Thigh: 11 (I can afford to lose 1 to 1.5 inches before it starts to hug my thighs) Knee: 8 (roomy all the way down from here to my ankles after this, I can afford to lose 2 - 3 inches on my calves...
New Posts  All Forums: