New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by rikod

btw, the last ones you posted are quite nice but nobody of us want to admit it
^ and they are burgundy on top
ftfy, nobody even noticed the nice Carmina posted by Gerry Nelson 4 pages back (FOUR pages back)
Both are really nice.In the oxford I like the way everything matches, the grain and reg. leather in the laces area matches the wt / vamp area. all brogue lines and curves are almost perfectly paralel, it's very pleasant visually, my wingtip is not like that, never seen a wingtip like that.That made sense?, maybe I need help here, again, sorry for my bad shoe vocabulary, DWFII would hate to read this.
Sounds great, can you post a photo of them?
I agree, I'm not a fan of either double monks or boots so no for me, but they look good and I suspect they will look great with one of those dark trousers of yours. Nice to see something different.
No, but I have received enough feedback from members and from Vass and I'm willing to order based on that. I'm undecided between a Theresianer, Atl Wien, plain toe, or a norweger in light colored grain. I'm leaning toward a plain toe or the norweger. It will be a gift from my wife for my 50th birthday. Any suggestions would be welcome!You are right, it's a personal thing, I'm used to wear more substantial? footwear with jeans.
Why?, what I meant is that I like both derbies you just posted in this page, that they are different styles but love them both.What about oxfords?, what is the place of oxfords in the AH school?, I prefer derbies in general but I enjoy oxfords too and fit me well.
That last one you just posted if one of them (and the one above too). Different styles, Both fantastic
Thank you uncle!
New Posts  All Forums: