or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by Mr. Lee

That is a fine choice. if you would consider rectangular try Baume et Mercier Hampton Square 8607. Not as easy to find as a Tag. I have one. Also, if you want to bargain hunt, try www. watchuseek.com Great deals from watch nuts. I paid $600 for the watch I have just recommended and it retails on discount watch sites for about $1,600. You can't tell if from new and the people on the site are as fanatical about the condition of what they are buying/selling as the...
J. Peterman. 55% cashmere, 45% silk. I have two in black and one in grey. Note on sizing: I am 44R and bought the first as an XL--seemed ok. The last two I bought we just a Large and they are better. Also, the first one is 10 years old and still going strong. I think the Merino ones from Brooks Bros. are too lightweight and kind of cheap (at $89.50, I think, I guess they should be.)
Thanks, that was enormously helpful! I'll work on it after I finish douching today, jerky.
Judging by the sheer jerkiness of the replies two of you decided it was worth your time to submit, just forget I asked. I could make the hug proposed interesting if it was in person--take you down a peg or two--once you woke up. You can go back to work or busting other people's chops.
I have these and the comment posted by Ranger as to brown only and improving with age is right on the money. They may not be a $1,000 shoe like many SF'ers favor, but they are nice for the price.
The dressier Timex's and Skagen pictured are the way to go. The MJ would not have been a good choice. No classic watch has the brand name written around the perimeter like that. That's an el cheapo fashion watch, not a classic watch.
I do, but considering the people I am usually riding with the translation amounts to something different. Still, I think it's a nice gesture and certainly not intrusive. Makes up for some of the a-holes on cell phones in elevators!
Very nice-didn't see the price posted or inquired about?
Spoo is right. If they were a whole lot sleeker, the branding would not bother me. But this looks like Frye boot branding--clunky footwear, obvious branding. In fact, the style is so unusual that, couple with the branding, MIGHT make people think they're fakes.
At 5"11" unless something about your torso or legs was out of whack there is no way you would be a short. It would be helpful if you had a side shot, close up, showing your hand cupped around the hem on the side--the skirt of the jacket should fall into the fold of your fingers. From what I can see, your's looks fine. The usual problem for guys is the sleeves are too long. Not for guys on this site, but for the general male population, mind you. But, based on your...
New Posts  All Forums: