Quote:Originally Posted by samnc oh, also the distressing marks on the shoes are considered more casual than shoes w/o them, right?
You're talking about brogueing, I believe. Yes, shoes with that are considered more casual.
Formal = utility.
Better = taste.
Totally unrelated. Something could be formal but in poor taste. I.E. patent leather shoes that are ugly.
Something could be exquisite, but informal. I.E. cordovan brogues.
Quote:Originally Posted by ncc1701d Hi. I'm flying into Paris, arriving 27th December. Does the paris shop have a good range of boots and do I need to make an appointment? Cheers.
I was just at the Paris shop last week. From what I...
Quote:Originally Posted by gyasih Trunk show at Leffot today.
I totally forgot to take pics of the shoes there... totally unlike me...
But ordered a pair of Greshams in Midnight Blue with heavy burnishing. Delivery in May...
I found a pair of Antonio Maurizi shoes at DSW. They looked great, fit great, and were a good price. However, the build quality on them were absolutely garbage. I think I paid $150 for them, and don't think it was worth it. After...