or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by IIIrd Icon

xposting my fits for my 701 SU1 @W34 & 702 @W33. 701s were comfort slim from the getgo & shrunk a bit more after a couple of years after multiple washes. just glad i sized up on them 702s were a bit tight to start with. loved the denim on this, but after the 4th soak i decided i don't want to deal with stretching them out each out each & every wash, down the line ... so, let them go. recently, i just special ordered a pair of 202SP w/c i future-sized @W34, so...
shameless plug: will be putting up @marketplace worn for a week, but decided they're just too big for me & needed to size down Tagged W34 : "BiG-style" :: w= 18, ins= 36.25, fr= 10.5, br= 14.5, u/t= 12.5, kne= 9, leg= 9 [img]
sometimes "ideal" does not mean it's practical. the 202 has a longer back rise ... IMO better cut for your built.
shameless plug: will be putting up 3105 W34 up on the board @marketplace as soon as pix are available ... dint really wanna sell, but i mis-sized
i think there will be leather lining @vamp, as with most [if not all] their service boots
will be sizing the same way ... the only reason that's keeping me from kopping right away is because i'm timing/anticipating when the Teck Cordo "Allan" MTO [ie, SF x Tricker's x SH] is slated to drop. unlike some folks around here, i have a very limited discretionary fund to work with
@Diabolical__ see that's what was a bit confusing for me ... since i have a "width" issue. 'tried on some 2030s @Barney's & had to size up [from the 2005, ie] to compensate on the width. apparently, the 2005s are a bit more generous up front ... w/c i essentially look for. anyway, if the "Munson" lasted 2045 has same length as the 2005, i should be alright sizing true .... just needed some affirmation
^just did__ thanx!
bumping this question
Just double checking before putting in the order__ Service Boots on 2005 last UK 8 = 8 on 2045?
New Posts  All Forums: