or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by A Fellow Linguist

thnxGreat pieces? They do nothing to flatter the female form. It came off as sexless and sterile.
it's bad, imo.Also Ann D is sort of depressing. Not that I think it's awful, but it's just so basic.
lol styleforum
Thanks for a perfect example of the kind of thinking that prevents change.You don't know what you're talking about and I'm not going to get into it anymore.Mods, ban me.
I'm sure there are people who fetishize lolita, but the beauty of the situation is that in doing so they're essentially outing themselves as creeps. And getting back to the point, none of what you said means that people should get a free pass on being gross and making dumb jokes.ENLIGHTEN ME, MOTHERFUCKER.
So what? People shouldn't dress that way because there are perverts out there? Everyone should probably just put burlap sacks on, just to be safe.
How can something call for fetishization? Is it like asking to be raped? Maybe the comparison is extreme, but the over the top, almost aggressive innocence of lolita is in many ways meant to subvert the male gaze. It takes "moe/kawaii" culture and turns it up to 11, bringing with it a new set of aesthetic values that deliberately puts off random dudes on the street while providing an avenue to build a kind of non-mainstream, but still distinctly feminine, identity.
Seriously dude? I know this is internet bro zone, but do we have to jump to sex and rape jokes every time somebody posts a picture of a girl? It's especially dumb in this case because she's dressed in a style that explicitly rejects sexualization.
...is that a deer ?
Heh, women these days, am I right fellas? Always trying to be in relationships they actually want to be in. Acting like entitled children. Why can't they appreciate what a great guy I am? Why can't they just shut up and accept the banal disappointment of our relationship??
New Posts  All Forums: