or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by JustinW

I really hate the way the debate has been framed with this term 'Hi Capacity Magazines' arbitrarily set at the number 10. The term implies that anything over ten is some evil after-market addition and not the norm. I regularly shoot an FN GP35, which was designed in 1935 to hold a 13 round magazine. It seems to me a more correct phrasing would be a ban on standard capacity magazines.
^ What is your position on barrel shrouds?
Just the hi-capacity assault beds. Sporting futons should be except.
On a lighter note: http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2010/crime-in-the-u.s.-2010/tables/10shrtbl08.xls http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/mor_fal_inv_bed-mortality-fall-involving-bed
Wow Iwasmatt sounds like Barbara Boxer in this thread. Weird.
PMag bling is the new gold, apparently:
I lean closer to GT now we are talking about negligence with a firearm. In my state it is a crime to allow an unsupervised minor access to a firearm - I agree with this and think it should be a felony in such cases of gross negligence as this example.
Brownells sells 3.5 years’ worth of magazines in 72 hours http://www.guns.com/2012/12/20/brownells-sells-3-5-years-worth-of-magazines-in-36-hours/
Deleted - tri burst post!
Deleted - semi-auto posting!
New Posts  All Forums: