or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by mensimageconsultant

That's not surprising. Meanwhile, Rockports and Doc Martens tend not to look like proper shoes for the office. How about providing size info and an approximate location?
As he said, the shoes.... The Clarks are hardly an upgrade, because they are too casual for most offices (don't lace up enough). The pair of jeans has a marginally acceptable fit. The pants are too long (most of them clearly so) and pulling at the hips - they might be as well be replaced. White pants are not for business, by the way. The belts look adequate. The yellow shirt looks bad.
That's likely due to sloping shoulders and accentuated by the fabric type.
Probably, but they might be driving shoes, which have limited usefulness.
Wool/linen is not as cool as pure linen, even if the wool is very lightweight. However, unstructured linen would wrinkle terribly. A navy jacket is too close in color to typical dressy blue jeans. Post #2 was mostly correct, but patch pockets at the hip aren't necessary, though on a v-shape, they'll probably look okay.
He has said his pants are custom-tailored. And they're too tight, frankly, which would be an argument against using his tailor.
It is casual, but still.... Maybe it's more a juxtaposition of summer items with cold-weather items.
It could go with light-colored chinos and jeans too, of course. Moleskins probably. However, a white tee shirt is too casual and a dress shirt maybe too formal. A sportshirt would be best.
That much money on cotton/poly items is not okay, especially when the fit is unsatisfactory.
The socks are okay. Most women aren't going to actively like any of the items, though. Sneakers will be too casual for many, the pants blah (jeans would be better), the sweater (color) boring and rather unmasculine.... Maroon/burgundy would be a better choice.
New Posts  All Forums: