or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by A Y

Yes, the original when Coava was still selling them. I get more residue with the Able.LOL. Why didn't you go full #StyFoDude on them and complain about the sewing machine on the label? You should have been, “Fatte a mano. Look it up sometime.”Anyway, Handlebar is a bit slow on putting their new coffee on their site. I'll mention it to them the next time I'm there (probably today).
I think PB and I have always said the pressure methods highlight acidity. When I want darker notes to stand out, I do CCD. I don't think the pressure in a FP is enough to matter, but since they let so much grit through, it's tough to compare them to other methods.
Never mind the odor-control coffee grounds, what about those rubberized buttons for grip? I can't tell if those are also actual working buttonholes.I tried the Kaffeologie S-filter this morning in the Aeropress, and it seems to work well and lend a bit more body to the coffee. The filter itself works very well in that I get very little grit, perhaps comparable to the Espro, but maybe even less. It definitely filters better than the Able. The thickness of the filter means...
Try the Kilenso in a CCD. The Aeropress tends to brew lighter and emphasize more acidity. I have the S-filter for Aeropress coming, and it's got a much finer mesh than the Able disk. Some grinders are also known for generating more fines than others. I don't have a specific recommendation here, but maybe Scott or Joshua might? For espresso and I would guess pourover, the fines ratio may be important for controlling the flow rate.
Handlebar fans: they're about to offer their first natural process Ethiopian, as well as their first Kenyan bean ever. I believe the Ethiopian is this one: http://www.royalcoffee.com/Products/0032543 One of the best coffees I've ever had was a natural process from the Gedeo region offered by Coffea Roasterie a few years ago, so I have very high expectations for this one.
Yes definitely, but subjecting the same bean from the same harvest to 3 different processing methods is a bit gimmicky. I wish they'd make up their mind and give us what they think is the best expression of that harvest for that year.But only if you use the right kind of honey and yeast. Obviously, free-range bees and heirloom yeasts.
Sorry I have no experience with Delonghi, but I don't see why it won't suffer from the same kinds of problems that other 1-touch machines have.
Nespresso with a separate milk foamer thing will be cheaper and much better than any of the one-touch machines, but you have to do some extra work.
It's kind of a trendy thing to process the same bean three different ways. Honey is a hybrid of wet and dry, said to give the best of both worlds. I've had good and bad examples of each of the processes, and which one you use depends on many other factors, many of which have nothing to do with taste. For example, wet-process is very water-intensive, and can't be used in places with little water. Same with drying processes --- some work better in areas with lots of rainfall...
Strawberries (and blueberries) are usually a sign of dry (or natural) process milling. In the dry process, the coffee bean (the seed of the coffee cherry) is dried with the fruit still on it, and this causes fermentation. Wet process milling strips the fruit away from the seed before drying. The degree of fermentation could be how long they leave the fruit on?
New Posts  All Forums: