Originally Posted by odoreater
If the contract is valid, then the guy gets 84% regardless of what other investors did. Zuckerberg could only transfer the interest that he owns.
The investors' remedy would be against Zuckerberg at law, and against Facebook in equity.
This, to me, will be the gist of the problem (assuming the contract is valid). In equity, it would seem manifestly unfair for investors, who've put in hundreds of...