or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by bengal-stripe

It's a bovine leather but it comes from an older animal.It might be a heifer (cow that has not calved yet) or a mature cow.
The outsole is stitched totally conventional to the overhanging section of the welt/rand.It's a plain leather strip (of standard length) and not really a bon welt, as it is not decorated (wheeled or stitched) prior to being attached. Once in place, the welt gets marked for the required number of stitches (in my case 3 stitches/cm or 1/2 PP), stitched to the outer sole, wheeled, dyed, cut etc.. like any other welt.Only the method of attachment is unconventional, everything...
I have a pair of boots which were made by that method (not by the same firm, but in the same town and one proprietor was trained in the other firm). When you rip off the full-length sock, you can see the wood pegs coming through the insole. (A long sock can hide many sins, no wonder why some firms are keen on long socks.)Method: Block and cut insole. Last upper with nails, than brace upper to insole and remove nails as you go along. Secure welt (or probably strictly...
only if - and that's a big 'if' - the hand welting is properly executed and with due care. Despite what DWF has claimed, not every one is whiter than white and artisans are equally capable (like everyone else) of short-cuts and sloppy work. There are quite a few crafty and shrewd operators around in the bespoke shoe business.I suppose, that would have to be called "hand-welted" - after all, that chap bangs the pegs in by hand!
It's called "Littleway" in England.The name "Blake" is used in Italy, "McKay" in the States and "Littleway" in England. There might be slight differences between the three, but essentially it is the same method.That's how a Blake/McKay/Littlewood machine looks like. The last is (temporary) removed, the shoe gets hung over the 'horn' and guided "round the horn(e)".
Interesting demonstration how different camera angles or different focal length can distort a photograph..On the top picture the toe cap of either shoe looks pretty substantial. But on the bottom picture the caps look considerably smaller.I wonder, if these Matterhorn insteps Bestetti builds into his shoe are nothing but camera distortions .
I don't think Quartier 206 ever carried Vass. They probably were mentioned in reply to this question:
How do the English pronounce some ancient family names like Cholmondeley, Featherstonhaugh, Marjoribanks? (Google the answer!)As far as I know, they are not names of EG models.
What makes an expensive wine like Chateau P├ętrus worth the price (compared to $7.50 bottle of plonk)? http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303919504577520711642717718 http://www.bbr.com/producer-400-petrus Obviously, as both are fermented grape juice, there are no substantive difference between the two.
That suit is probably "genuine" (as far as it goes). Before Alexander McQueen got taken under the wings of what was then PPR (Kering now) in 2001, he had a licencing deal with some Italian manufacturer to produce an Alexander McQueen range of suits and overcoats. I've seen these suits before, they are from the mid-late 1990s and the suits are pretty ugly and cheaply made. Obviously the suit range wasn't a great success and didn't last very long. Stay well clear!
New Posts  All Forums: