or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by Parker

I feel like I don't possess enough inner turmoil or understanding of tessellate geometry to properly wear Lucio Vanotti.    However, something -- perhaps a timeless sartorial awareness or the fact that the garments sway between second and third dimensions -- makes me think it will appeal to me. 
the Fuuma fits are all great. creating a personal style is kinda the whole point imo -- even if you're screwing with the lingua franca of a particular forum. 
  Because a good photographer shooting a whole lookbook would be WAY more expensive than that. ++ models, assistants, hair/make-up, location fee, design, retouching, etc. all add up. I love look books -- they embody the romance and ideals of fashion -- along with runway shows and editorials. But for my own clothes buying I've learned to accept habitant's idea: if it looks good on some short model with average build on some half-baked e-commerce page, there's a pretty good...
would I ever wear a white MA-1? I like it conceptually but then I think how grungy it will get at my local dive bar or on the subway. although maybe that is the charm, like banged up white sneakers.  
fwiw BART still looks exactly the same.
 +1   great jacket.    I can see you guys liking SEH Kelly too. 
Something to read while we're all waiting for the Uniqlo drop.   Vestoj Interview with Christophe Lemaire: Conversations on Slownesshttp://vestoj.com/conversations-on-slowness-4/   
"stop making sense"   While it's nice to see a look that is fully integrated (Ivy/Trad should = penny loafer + flat front chino + saddle shoulder knit + ocbd, etc), why not an eclectic, mash-up approach? Same with music, interior design, etc. So bust out your metal tee, bucket hat and those beefrolls. 
Conceptual Florist
In 2000s I was in my minimalist-architect phase. 
New Posts  All Forums: