or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by Joona

Being 0,5 size smaller has probably more to do with the size difference than construction...
black calf DR1 after some wear, feels more pliable and the grain is starting to show a little more. Very satisfied with it.   
Hi,    I have for sale my GF's TOJ Women's Diesel Blue Heavy Calf Suede QBCDR, channel quilting.    Stunning jacket, but unfortunately it was slightly too small for her, hence she's only worn it couple of times.    Size is ~ XS. The color is most accurate in detail shots.    The measurements are approximately:    shoulders 15.0" chest (p2p) 17,8" midsection 15,5" waist 17.0" body length, front 17,3" body length, back 19,3" sleeve length, from shoulder...
the last is same (320) in both Apsley models. http://www.freemanbrand.com/journal/nigel-cabourn-scotts-last-expedition.htmlthough, I agree that the toe shape looks a bit different.
And the upcoming natural shell boots are supposed to be on "the new last".
IIRC the eyelet issue had something to do with eyelets being too far apart from each others. Anyway, at least for me, 5 eyelets have worked very well in my size 8 1940's service boots. A lot easier/faster to get on and off compared to 7 eyelet boondockers and 8 eyelet service boots.
  What would the midsection then roughly be in future DR orders if I now have ~ 23" chest / 19.5" waist in my current DR1? 
 I use mostly (pretty old) Bexley shoe trees and IMO they fit 2030 well. For reference, I use size 41 shoe trees for size 8 Vibergs.
Thanks :)    @JR Magat yeah that's right, black shell (and the pair on the right is black buffalo & black rough out buffalo). More detailed shots of both black pairs: http://www.styleforum.net/t/224463/viberg-boots/6195#post_7265161
New Posts  All Forums: